Writing is also integrative in perhaps the most basic possible sense: the organic, the functional. (…) both the left and right hemispheres of the brain. Writing is markedly bispheral. Left: liner written product processing material linearity. Right: source of intuition.
(…)
“The right hemisphere seems to be the source of intuition, of sudden gestalts, of flashes of images, of abstractions occurring as visual or spatial wholes, as the initiating metaphors for the creative process” (Emig, Janet “Writing as Mode of Learning” College Composition and Communication Vol. 28, N. 2. (May 1977), pp. 122-128
Emig’s article on using writing as a mode of learning is a simple, yet useful article in ode to the power and process of writing as a research method. The ideas are simple and direct. Writing has the power to make of the abstract something material- becoming of a trace of thought; writing carries an intrinsic power and induction of synthesis and analysis. Through the practice of writing, my research will become more concrete and therefore the project will gain body, shape and form. Writing is also the primary form of practice from which a greater body of research will be given sense. Writing poetry, film, theses, analysis, speeches, manifestos, stories, narratives, thoughts… All forms of writing within their own privileges and enclosures are practices of structuring or de-structuring our universe of symbols and signs, our impulse to give meaning and make sense. Writing as a form of meditation, of contemplation, of confessing, of analyzing, of synthesizing, of creating, of restructuring, and constructing the infinite universe of our floating ideas. So here in this ode to writing as a form of empirical, subjective and phenomenological research, I define and draw the lines for the primary conceptions of my research methodology, which in all its chaos, will eventually create a harmonious cacophony.
The practice of writing is also intrinsically linked to the veins of my research project. That which is the emblem of French Post Feminists philophers: Irigaray, Kristeva and Cixous (centrally) call une Ecriture Feminine. Here I very briefly (this subject requires a lot more attention) introduce Irigaray’s virtuous and complex concept of ecriture feminine, a concept which is central to the conception of this project, this research and further this immersion into the conception of a feminine language, or more like langage, as in the practice and conception of writing and creating symbols and signs, in its full symbolic sense.
This quote from Helene Cixous captures the nature of ecriture feminine, here she ponders upon what a feminine language would be, become…
She lets the other language speak-the language of 1,000 tongues which knows neither enclosure nor death…. Her language does not contain, it carries; it does not hold back, it makes possible.
(…)
Oral drive, anal drive, vocal drive-all these drives are our strengths, and among them is the gestation drive-just like the desire to write: a desire to live self from within, a desire for the swollen belly, for language, for blood
These embryonic and visceral drives shall become and be in language, in image, in thought, in life.